Good food for thought by Kate Starboard who explores misconceptions around disinformation online and “coordinated inauthentic behavior” with a focus on polictics. This is highly relevant to clinical research, disease prevention, and healthcare as well. Some of the key takeaways:

  • Those behind disinformation campaigns purposely entangle orchestrated action with organic activity.
  • Disinformation campaigns promoting multiple, often conflicting, views.
  • Disinformation is not simply false information, it often layers true information with false.
  • Disinformation stems mainly from agents producing false content (paid ‘trolls’) and automated accounts (‘bots’) that promote it. Members of the audience become willing but unwitting collaborators who are unaware of their role, but who amplify and embellish messages.
  • The message of a campaign is the same as its goals.
  • Disinformation targets only the unsavvy or uneducated, that it works only on ‘others’. Disinformation often specifically uses the rhetoric and techniques of critical thinking to foster nihilistic scepticism.
  • Kate concludes that “as researchers and policymakers, we have to go beyond trying to measure the impact of individual disinformation campaigns using simple models of inputs (for example, messages posted by bots or trolls) and outputs (such as likes, retweets or even votes). We need models that can encompass how disinformation changes hearts, minds, networks and actions.”

Keep reading

Leave a Comment